Protocol and development documentation
Preserved interpretation accesses a learned neural expert while retaining original instruction-following weights. The four-owner final passes: 949/1,024 newly worded knowledge answers, with all earlier outputs and losses reproduced exactly.
Frozen feature reuse develops repeated training of an added shard without recomputing the immutable distributed prefix each time.
Knowledge rehearsal isolates repeated exposure while retaining the existing generated-answer and retention requirements.
| Start here | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Live LLM checklist | Six fixed completion goals, the active milestone and evidence of completion. |
| Join the alpha | Pinned source, public ledger observer, starter credits and paid multi-turn chat during the funded window. |
| Alpha deployment result | Measured latency, automatic recovery, public evidence, funding and remaining limits. |
| Operated alpha | Atomic funded admission, provider maintenance, automatic recovery and the distinction between AWS hosts and independent operators. |
| Provider LLM service | Frozen accepted-model concurrency, streaming, recovery and complete-cost trial, including failed setups. |
| Provider runtime | Native discovery, assigned-partition restoration, authenticated execution and recovery. |
| Hosted chat | Lightweight client, complete price caps, provisional streaming, settled conversation history and public-data limits. |
| Finite sponsorship | Complete learning/serving cost scope, replay-quorum assumptions and bounded research funding. |
| Continual admission results | Three prospective admitted cohorts, automatic continuation, retained answers, an equal-resource growth comparison and complete native replay; checklist items 1 and 2 complete. |
| Public testnet | Install the client, join, earn test NEURO and request inference. |
| LLM protocol | Supported training, payments, consensus and model-serving rules. |
| Model card | Capabilities, limits, evaluation and provenance. |
| API | Native ledger and inference interfaces. |
| Data pipeline | Immutable ingestion, collection and verification. |
| Node deployment | Pinned runtimes, service templates, recovery and monitoring. |
| Model evolution | Experimental full-model training, growth, verification and reproduction. |
| Text protocol | Model/tokenizer identity, response windows, document evaluation and text conformance. |
| Native lifecycle | Curated fresh data, training, quality decisions and paid generation on isolated networks. |
| Lifecycle evidence | Real-model integration, failed promotion, recovery and continued training. |
| Compact optimizer disputes | Bounded SGD refutations, complete-audit requirements and measured costs. |
| Funded auditing | Prepaid complete replay, reporting windows, collateral, payments and refunds. |
| Funded audit evidence | Two-host execution, recovery, public peer connectivity, costs and failure analysis. |
| Audit admission RFC | Proposed atomic reservations and refutation funding; not activated. |
| Candidate operations | Recovering operators and auditors, full-node joining and bootstrap ownership. |
| Scaling design | Compute groups, audit funding, capacity-backed growth and release gates. |
| Inherited ledger rules | Reference consensus, accounting, bonds and dispute assumptions. |
| LLM experiments | Measured outcomes, including failures, with historical evidence links. |
| Research requirements | Remaining conditions for a stronger public deployment. |
| Learning milestone | Frozen useful-learning, continual-learning and two-host scaling contract. |
| Learning result | Completed 128-step run, rejected quality gate, all generations and downloadable checkpoint. |
| GPU learning reference | Complete-conversation full-model training, held-out evaluation, checkpoint recovery and a bounded GPU trial. |
| GPU reference results | Completed 1.7B training, exact same-host recovery, inconclusive test gain, all answer pairs and target audit. |
| Cooperative experiment | Frozen target-quality, two-GPU training and replicated-serving comparisons. |
| Cooperative results | Measured task learning, shared parameter agreement, communication overhead and inference failover. |
| Four-worker methods | Frozen local-window training, complete group checkpoints and replica-serving comparisons. |
| Four-worker results | Reduced communication, exact process-crash recovery, failed quality preservation and a corrected compression feasibility probe. |
| Shared-gradient learning | Passed task/retention screen with lower communication; buffer equivalence and stronger batching controls. |
| Batched comparison | Passed full-length quality/retention screen and 1.45× faster training; 38% more GPU seconds, fixed model size. |
| Persistent model shards | Train and generate through disjoint model partitions with complete optimizer/RNG checkpoints. |
| Shard recovery results | Physical-host replacement and exact recovery of a 1.7B model across two GPU shards. |
| Adaptive shard experiment | Portable Adam state, reference regularization, redistribution and gated model growth. |
| Adaptive shard results | Measured redistribution, complete GPU replay, native settlement and quality decisions. |
| Native shard replay | Bond-weighted complete replay, sponsor-funded audits and bounded GPU update issuance. |
| Portable jobs and serving | Native recipe activation, separately audited quality approval and escrow-paid inference across model shards. |
| Continued learning / result | Three-shard continuation completed; generated-answer gate failed despite lower loss. |
| Calculation-step learning / result | Large generated-answer gain, failed sorting/filtering retention; all final answer pairs published. |
| Weight consolidation / result | Prior answers retained and large new-task gain; two sorting regressions still fail the final gate. |
| Answer-balanced continuation / result | Complete frozen gate passes: new answers 378→462, all 188 correct prior answers retained, three model shards. |
| Preserved interpretation | Original-model interpretation combined with a learned expert; distributed quality evaluation. |
| Second expert with interpretation | Separate learning owner, continued earlier serving and exact retention; execution requires the preceding final to pass. |
| Native expert lifecycle result | 560 distinct audited updates, 560 NEURO, separate graph promotion, earned-token inference and complete public ledger replay; checklist item 3 complete. |
| Ordinary serving diagnostic | Inference-only planned-path screen on ordinary development questions; gold controls separate knowledge, selection, decomposition and assembly. Not a training, promotion or new-final result. |
This directory contains technical documentation and pinned dependency profiles. Manuscripts, publication figures and raw experiment dumps are outside the tracked tree. The published paper remains available. Historical evidence is linked to revision 108b4ba3d6c6fb5760ff211b447ee95a67fa9112, preserving access without mixing generated outputs into the current checkout.
eval/data/input.txt is a deliberate exception: the small licensed Tiny Shakespeare corpus is a test and source-compatibility fixture used by the reference implementation. Its path and bytes are retained; its license and digest are recorded. Network genesis/data manifests under networks are also required protocol inputs, not disposable training output.
Example settings and compact reproduction plans live under config. Run python scripts/check_repository.py after staging moves to check tracked-file boundaries and local Markdown links. CI also checks package contents so local archives, website files and manuscripts cannot enter a distribution.
Compose the learned second expert: exact prompt preservation and actual two-call answers; frozen read-only experiment.
Native expert checkpoint representation: exact frozen ages, compact references and numerical work identity.
